ΘρϵηΠατπ

Ring Homomorphism
Suppose that (R,⊕︎,) and (S,,) are rings, and ϕ:RS is a function, then ϕ is a ring homomorphism if for any a,bR
  • ϕ(a⊕︎b)=ϕ(a)ϕ(b)
  • ϕ(ab)=ϕ(a)ϕ(b)
Ring with Unity Homomorphism
Suppose that R,S are rings with unity, then we say that ϕ is a homomorphism between R and S when ϕ is a ring homomorphism and we have ϕ(1R)=1S
Crone Homomorphism
Suppose that R,S are crones, then if ϕ is a ring with unit homomorphism, then we say that ϕ is a crone homomorphism

We may also say that ϕ is a homomorphism from R to S, or that ϕ is a homomorphism of rings

Crone Homomorphism Between Two by Two Matices with 0 in Bottom Left and Integers
Let R:={(ab0a):a,b} along with the usual definition for matrix addition and matrix multiplication, and define ϕ:R be defined such that ϕ((ab0a))=a Show the following
  • ϕ is a crone homomorphism
  • Find ker(ϕ)
  • Show R/ker(ϕ) is ismorphic to
  • is ker(ϕ) a prime ideal?

We start by showing ϕ is a crone homomorphism, note that we already know that R and are crones, now note the following: ϕ((ab0a)(cd0c))=ϕ((acac+bd0ac))=ac=ϕ((ab0a))ϕ((cd0c)) and that ϕ((ab0a)+(cd0c))=ϕ((a+cb+d0a+c))=a+c=ϕ((ab0a))+ϕ((cd0c))

We recognize that the 2×2 identity is the identity in this ring as well, therefore we confirm that ϕ((1001))=1 Thus ϕ is indeed a crone homomorphism

From the definition of ϕ we can conclude that ϕ((ab0a))=0 iff a=0, therefore the kernel is all matrices of this form ker(ϕ)={(0b00):b}

Recall the definition of R/ker(ϕ), it is {M+ker(ϕ):MR}amp;={{M+N:Nker(ϕ)}:MR}amp;={{(ab0a)+(0c00):c}:a,b}amp;={{(ab+c0a):c}:a,b}={{(ad0a):d}:a} Let tl(M) be defined as the top left coefficent in M, then for two matrices M,N it should be clear that if tl(N)=tl(M), then they generate the same coset, also that if tl(M)tl(N), then they generate different cosets. Also note that tl(MN)=tl(M)tl(N) and that tl(M+N)=tl(M)+tl(N). Finally given any coset, since we know that tl(X) agrees for every X in the coset, we can justify the construction of tl(N+ker(ϕ))=tl(N)

We claim that R/ker(ϕ) is an crone isomorphism to using tl. We've actually already verified the that it respects addition and multiplication because of our discussion in the previous paragraph and also just note that if I is the the identity then we know it's top left element is 1 so that tl(I)=tl(I)=1 .

At this point we know that it's a homomorphism. So we just have to show it's a bijection to have an isomorphism so suppose that M+ker(ϕ)N+ker(ϕ) by the contrapositive of what we noted earlier since they generate different cosets, then tl(N)tl(M), therefoer tl(N+ker(ϕ))tl(M+ker(ϕ)) , which shows that tl is injective, it is clearly also surjective because since R ranges over all matrices with integer coefficients, then if we pick a particular integer k then there is always a matrix with that specific integer in it's top left component, say that matrix is X, then tl(X)=tl(X)=k as needed, so tl is an isomorphism.

Now we verify that ker(ϕ) is a prime ideal, so suppose that MNker(ϕ), this means that tl(MN)=0, but as noted earlier tl(MN)=tl(M)tl(N), but we know that so in this context we have tl(M)tl(N)=0, but is a domain therefore we must have wlog tl(M)=0, but that implies that Mker(ϕ) which shows that ker(ϕ) is a prime ideal as neeeded.

Ring Isomorphism
Suppose that ϕ is a ring homomorphism and is a bijection, then we say that ϕ is a ring isomorphism
Homomorphisms carry Zero to Zero
Suppose that ϕ:RS is a homomorphism of rings, then ϕ(0R)=0S