ΘρϵηΠατπ

Ring Homomorphism
Suppose that (R,⊕︎,⊗) and (S,⊞,⊠) are rings, and ϕ:R→S is a function, then ϕ is a ring homomorphism if for any a,b∈R
  • ϕ(a⊕︎b)=ϕ(a)⊞ϕ(b)
  • ϕ(a⊗b)=ϕ(a)⊠ϕ(b)
Ring with Unity Homomorphism
Suppose that R,S are rings with unity, then we say that ϕ is a homomorphism between R and S when ϕ is a ring homomorphism and we have ϕ(1R)=1S
Crone Homomorphism
Suppose that R,S are crones, then if ϕ is a ring with unit homomorphism, then we say that ϕ is a crone homomorphism

We may also say that ϕ is a homomorphism from R to S, or that ϕ is a homomorphism of rings

Crone Homomorphism Between Two by Two Matices with 0 in Bottom Left and Integers
Let R:={(ab0a):a,b∈ℤ} along with the usual definition for matrix addition and matrix multiplication, and define ϕ:R→ℤ be defined such that ϕ((ab0a))=a Show the following
  • ϕ is a crone homomorphism
  • Find ker⁡(ϕ)
  • Show R/ker⁡(ϕ) is ismorphic to ℤ
  • is ker⁡(ϕ) a prime ideal?

We start by showing ϕ is a crone homomorphism, note that we already know that R and ℤ are crones, now note the following: ϕ((ab0a)(cd0c))=ϕ((acac+bd0ac))=ac=ϕ((ab0a))ϕ((cd0c)) and that ϕ((ab0a)+(cd0c))=ϕ((a+cb+d0a+c))=a+c=ϕ((ab0a))+ϕ((cd0c))

We recognize that the 2×2 identity is the identity in this ring as well, therefore we confirm that ϕ((1001))=1 Thus ϕ is indeed a crone homomorphism

From the definition of ϕ we can conclude that ϕ((ab0a))=0 iff a=0, therefore the kernel is all matrices of this form ker⁡(ϕ)={(0b00):b∈ℤ}

Recall the definition of R/ker⁡(ϕ), it is {M+ker⁡(ϕ):M∈R}={{M+N:N∈ker⁡(ϕ)}:M∈R}={{(ab0a)+(0c00):c∈ℤ}:a,b∈ℤ}={{(ab+c0a):c∈ℤ}:a,b∈ℤ}={{(ad0a):d∈ℤ}:a∈ℤ} Let tl⁡(M) be defined as the top left coefficent in M, then for two matrices M,N it should be clear that if tl⁡(N)=tl⁡(M), then they generate the same coset, also that if tl⁡(M)≠tl⁡(N), then they generate different cosets. Also note that tl⁡(MN)=tl⁡(M)⋅tl⁡(N) and that tl⁡(M+N)=tl⁡(M)+tl⁡(N). Finally given any coset, since we know that tl⁡(X) agrees for every X in the coset, we can justify the construction of tl⁡(N+ker⁡(ϕ))=tl⁡(N)

We claim that R/ker⁡(ϕ) is an crone isomorphism to ℤ using tl⁡. We've actually already verified the that it respects addition and multiplication because of our discussion in the previous paragraph and also just note that if I is the the identity then we know it's top left element is 1∈ℤ so that tl⁡(I)=tl⁡(I)=1 .

At this point we know that it's a homomorphism. So we just have to show it's a bijection to have an isomorphism so suppose that M+ker⁡(ϕ)≠N+ker⁡(ϕ) by the contrapositive of what we noted earlier since they generate different cosets, then tl⁡(N)≠tl⁡(M), therefoer tl⁡(N+ker⁡(ϕ))≠tl⁡(M+ker⁡(ϕ)) , which shows that tl⁡ is injective, it is clearly also surjective because since R ranges over all matrices with integer coefficients, then if we pick a particular integer k∈ℤ then there is always a matrix with that specific integer in it's top left component, say that matrix is X, then tl⁡(X)=tl⁡(X)=k as needed, so tl⁡ is an isomorphism.

Now we verify that ker⁡(ϕ) is a prime ideal, so suppose that MN∈ker⁡(ϕ), this means that tl⁡(MN)=0, but as noted earlier tl⁡(MN)=tl⁡(M)tl⁡(N), but we know that ℤ so in this context we have tl⁡(M)tl⁡(N)=0, but ℤ is a domain therefore we must have wlog tl⁡(M)=0, but that implies that M∈ker⁡(ϕ) which shows that ker⁡(ϕ) is a prime ideal as neeeded.

Ring Isomorphism
Suppose that ϕ is a ring homomorphism and is a bijection, then we say that ϕ is a ring isomorphism
Homomorphisms carry Zero to Zero
Suppose that ϕ:R→S is a homomorphism of rings, then ϕ(0R)=0S