- are both associative and commutative
- Identities: There exist identity elements for and respectively
- Additive Inverses: There exists an such that
- Multiplicative Inverses: If there exists an such that
- Distributivity: distributes into
We already know that since is a field then is a crone, so one way would be just showing that it's a domain through this characterization of a domain
Suppose that and assume that , if , we've proven the statement, if , then since has multiplicative inverses for non-zero elements we know that , thus after cancellation and multiplication by one we have as needed.
Now let's observe the denominator , if this equals zero, then we have the following note that division is justified since from the fact that was non-zero. For this equation to make any sense we require that be an integer, which isn't necessarily the case and if it's not the case we've reached a contradiction.
Perhaps is an integer (non-zero), in that case we're saying that there exists some integer such that , but this is a contradiction as clearly the square of any non-zero integer is not prime, thus our original assumption that is false, and thus we can safely write our multiplicative inverse as
Suppose that is prime, we recall that is a crone. Therefore to show it's a field we have to show it has multiplicative inverses, so let . Since then therefore thus and we must have such that , taking this equation mod we see that in otherwords so that is 's multiplicative inverse so that is a field.
We use the contrapositive so assume that is not prime, therefore is composite, so we have for some so clearly and but at the same time therefore , which shows that is not a domain, therefore it cannot be a field, as needed for the contrapositive, so the original implication holds true