Union
Given two sets , then the union of
A
and
B
is defined as the set
A
∪
B
:=
{
p
∈
X
:
p
∈
A
∨
p
∈
B
}
Intersection
Given two sets
A
,
B
⊆
X
, then the intersection of
A
and
B
is defined as the set
A
∩
B
:=
{
p
∈
X
:
p
∈
A
∧
p
∈
B
}
A set Intersects Another
Suppose that
A
,
B
are sets, we say that
A
intersects
B
when
A
∩
B
≠
∅
Arbitrary Union
Suppose that
M
is a
family of sets, then
⋃
M
is defined so that
x
∈
⋃
M
⟺
∃
A
∈
M
,
x
∈
A
Arbitrary Intersection
Suppose that
M
is a
family of sets, then
⋂
M
is defined so that
x
∈
⋂
M
⟺
∀
A
∈
M
,
x
∈
A
Arbitrary Union Element of Notation
We define
⋃
A
∈
M
A
:=
⋃
M
Arbitrary Intersection Element of Notation
We define
⋂
A
∈
M
A
:=
⋂
M
Arbitrary Union Indexed Notation
Suppose that
I
is an index set for the collection
A
=
{
A
α
:
α
∈
I
}
where
A
α
is a set, then
⋃
α
∈
I
A
α
:=
⋃
A
. If the index set is known by context, then we may use the shorthand
⋃
α
A
α
Arbitrary Intersection Indexed Notation
Suppose that
I
is an index set for the collection
A
=
{
A
α
:
α
∈
I
}
where
A
α
is a set, then
⋂
α
∈
I
A
α
:=
⋂
A
. If the index set is known by context, then we may use the shorthand
⋂
α
A
α
Arbitrary Union Counting Notation
Suppose that
a
,
b
∈
Z
, with
a
<
b
, and
A
:=
{
A
i
:
i
∈
Z
,
a
≤
i
≤
b
}
, then
⋃
i
=
a
b
A
i
=
⋃
A
Arbitrary Intersection Counting Notation
Suppose that
a
,
b
∈
Z
, with
a
<
b
, and
A
:=
{
A
i
:
i
∈
Z
,
a
≤
i
≤
b
}
, then
⋂
i
=
a
b
A
i
=
⋂
A
disjoint sets
Given two sets
A
,
B
we say that
A
and
B
are disjoint when
A
∩
B
=
∅
pairwise disjoint sets
Suppose that
M
is a
family of sets, then we say these sets are pairwise disjoint when given
A
,
B
∈
M
such that
A
≠
B
, then
A
∩
B
=
∅
partition
Suppose that
X
is a set, then we say that a set
P
is a partition of
X
if and only if the following are true
partition of the integers
The family
{
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
<
0
}
,
{
0
}
,
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
>
0
}
}
is a partition of
Z
Note that the integers
−
1
,
0
,
1
show that the empty set is not in this family. We'll now prove that it's union equals
Z
, so let
p
∈
⋃
P
, therefore
p
is in at least one of the sets included in
P
, since each is a subset of
Z
, then we know
p
∈
Z
, for the reverse direction, we can assume that
p
∈
Z
, therefore we know that
p
is either positive, negative or zero, so that
p
∈
⋃
P
, this shows
⋃
P
=
Z
.
To show this family is pairwise disjoint, note that
0
∉
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
<
0
}
and
0
∉
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
>
0
}
, which shows us that
{
0
}
∩
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
<
0
}
=
∅
and
{
0
}
∩
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
>
0
}
=
∅
.
Given any positive integer, we know it cannot be a negative integer, therefore
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
<
0
}
∩
{
p
∈
Z
:
p
>
0
}
=
∅
, thus we know that
P
is pairwise disjoint, which concludes the proof.
a set intersected with a superset is itself
Let
A
,
B
be sets such that
A
⊆
B
, then
A
∩
B
=
A
We start by showing
A
∩
B
⊆
A
, so consider
x
∈
A
∩
B
, so we know that
x
∈
A
and
x
∈
B
, therefore we trivially know that
x
∈
A
, as needed
Now consider the other direction, we need to show that
A
⊆
A
∩
B
, so consider that
x
∈
A
, then we want to show that
x
∈
A
and
x
∈
B
, which really just simplifies to showing
x
∈
B
, but we know that
A
⊆
B
, therefore since
x
∈
A
, we know that
x
∈
B
finishing the proof
A Set Union a Subset is Itself
Let
A
,
B
be sets such that
B
⊆
A
, then
A
∪
B
=
A
We start by showing
A
∪
B
⊆
A
, so consider
x
∈
A
∪
B
, so we know that
x
∈
A
or
x
∈
B
, if
x
∈
A
we are done, on the other hand if
x
∈
B
, then since
B
⊆
A
, then
x
∈
A
as needed.
Supposing that
x
∈
A
, then we know that
x
∈
A
∪
B
is true.
Subset of an Intersection
Suppose that
A
,
B
,
C
are sets then
A
⊆
(
B
∩
C
)
iff
A
⊆
B
and
A
⊆
C
Suppose that
A
⊆
(
B
∩
C
)
, suppose
x
∈
A
, therefore
x
∈
B
and
x
∈
C
showing
A
⊆
B
and
A
⊆
C
Now suppose that
A
⊆
B
and
A
⊆
C
, therefore given
x
∈
A
, we can see that
x
∈
B
∩
C
as needed.
intersection factors from union
Suppose that
U
α
is an indexed family of sets, and
Y
is any set, then
⋃
α
∈
I
(
U
α
∩
Y
)
=
(
⋃
α
∈
I
U
α
)
∩
Y
Suppose that
x
∈
⋃
α
∈
I
(
U
α
∩
Y
)
, therefore there is some
β
∈
I
such that
x
∈
U
β
∩
Y
, so that
x
∈
U
β
and
x
∈
Y
. Since there is some
β
∈
I
such that
x
∈
U
β
then
x
∈
⋃
α
∈
I
U
α
, additionally we had that
x
∈
Y
so that
x
∈
(
⋃
α
∈
I
U
α
)
∩
Y
as needed
Now suppose that
x
∈
(
⋃
α
∈
I
U
α
)
∩
Y
, therefore
x
∈
(
⋃
α
∈
I
U
α
)
and
x
∈
Y
, due to this we have some
β
∈
I
, such that
x
∈
U
β
and thus
x
∈
U
β
∩
Y
which by definition shows that
x
∈
⋃
α
∈
I
(
U
α
∩
Y
)
intersection factors from intersection
Suppose that
U
α
is an indexed family of sets, and
Y
is any set, then
⋂
α
∈
I
(
U
α
∩
Y
)
=
(
⋂
α
∈
I
U
α
)
∩
Y
Suppose that
x
∈
⋂
α
∈
I
(
U
α
∩
Y
)
, therefore for every
α
∈
I
we have:
x
∈
U
α
∩
Y
, so that
x
∈
U
α
and
x
∈
Y
. Since it's true for every
α
∈
I
then
x
∈
⋂
α
∈
I
U
α
, additionally we had that
x
∈
Y
so that
x
∈
(
⋂
α
∈
I
U
α
)
∩
Y
as needed
Now suppose that
x
∈
(
⋂
α
∈
I
U
α
)
∩
Y
, therefore
x
∈
(
⋂
α
∈
I
U
α
)
and
x
∈
Y
, due to this, for every
α
∈
I
, we know
x
∈
U
α
and thus
x
∈
U
α
∩
Y
which by definition shows that
x
∈
⋂
α
∈
I
(
U
α
∩
Y
)
Union of Subsets is Still a Subset
Suppose that
C
is a collection of subsets of
X
, then
⋃
C
⊆
X
Let
x
∈
⋃
C
∈
C
C
, then
x
∈
U
for some
U
∈
C
, since
U
must be a subset of
X
then x is also in
X
. As needed
An Intersection of Supersets is still a Superset
Suppose that
C
is a collection of supersets of
X
, then
⋂
C
⊇
X
Let
x
∈
X
, suppose that
C
∈
C
, thus by definition
C
⊇
X
, and since
x
∈
X
we must deduce
x
∈
C
, therefore
x
∈
⋂
C
as needed.
Intersection Decreases as It Intersects More Things
Suppose that
N
,
M
are families of sets such that
N
⊆
M
, then
⋂
M
⊆
⋂
N
Let
x
∈
⋂
M
, then for every
S
∈
M
,
x
∈
S
. Now consider any
K
∈
N
, then
K
∈
M
therefore
x
∈
K
which shows that
x
∈
⋂
N
as needed.
A set Covered in Subsets is a Union
Suppose
A
is a set and that for each
a
∈
A
, there is a
B
a
such that
a
∈
B
a
⊆
A
, then
A
=
⋃
a
∈
A
B
a
We can see that
C
=
{
B
a
:
a
∈
A
}
is a collection of subsets of
A
, so since a union of a subsets is still a subset we have
⋃
a
∈
A
B
a
⊆
A
.
But also given
p
∈
A
we know that
p
∈
B
p
so
p
∈
⋃
a
∈
A
B
a
which shows
A
⊆
⋃
a
∈
A
B
a
, so we can conclude
A
=
⋃
a
∈
A
B
a
.