ΘρϵηΠατπ

Suppose that (An) is a sequence of sets, then we say that AnA iff \left( I \left( A _ n \right) \to I \left( A \right) \right) A sequence (xn) converges to x if \forall \epsilon \in \mathbb{ R } ^ { > 0 }, \exists N in \mathbb{ N } _ 0 \text{ st } n > N \implies \lvert x _ n - x \rvert < \epsilon ParseError: Expected '}', got '&' at position 39: …athbb{ R } ^ { &̲gt; 0 }, \exist… Suppose that (fn) is a sequence of functions, then we say it converges pointwise to f if for any xdom(f) we have that (fn(x)) converges to \left( f \left( x \right) \right)
Increasing Sequence of Sets
Let (An) be a sequence of sets, then we say that it's increasing when A0A1A2...
Decreasing Sequence of Sets
Let (An) be a sequence of sets, then we say that it's decreasing when A0A1A2...
A Sequence of Sets Increase to Another
Suppose that (An) is an increasing sequence of sets, then we say it increases to A when n=1An=A, and write (An)A
A Sequence of Sets Decrease to Another
Suppose that (An) is an decreasing sequence of sets, then we say it decreases to A when n=1An=A, and write (An)A
Half Closed Subset of Open for Smaller Value
Suppose that a,b,c such that b<c, then (a,b](a,c)
Open Sets as an Increasing Sequence of Sets
Let J:={(x,y]:x,y}, show that there is an increasing sequence of sets that increase to the interval (a,b)

We define the sequence An:=(a,b1n] for each n1 . We first show that the sequence is increasing, let k1 in, and note that k<k+1, that is 1k>1k+1, therefore (a,b1k](a,b1k+1], so that AkAk+1, therefore (An) is increasing.

We now show that i=1An=(a,b). Let xi=1An, by definition this means that there is some j1 such that xAj, in other words x(a,b1j] since b1j<b then we know that (a,b1j](a,b) (by the above lemma), therefore we know that x(a,b) .

We now work on the opposite inclusion, so assume that x(a,b), note that x<b, so that bx>0, and define N:=1bx+1, note that N>0 then we have the following: 1bx<N therefore by multiplying each side by 1N and then bx, we obtain that 1N<bx.

Now notice that 1N<bx is equivalent to 1N>xb which is the same as b1N>x thus we can also say that x<b1N<b and we we clearly see that x(a,x] therefore we can conclude that x(a,b1N], but (a,b1N] is exactly AN, so we've shown there is some k1 such that xAk (namely k=N ) therefore by definition xi=1Ai as needed.