Let , then the basis element works since are open in themselves.
Suppose that where and , then but since intersection and cartesian product commute, then , but since are open in and respectively, then so is their finite intersection so therefore is already a basis element so we can take in the definition of a basis.
- and are continuous
- Suppose that and are continuous then defined as is continuous
Let respectively, and then note that and that since those are both basis elements, then they are open sets.
Now suppose that were continuous, so now we'll show that is continuous, so we take a basis element now we have thus, as an intersectino of two open sets, it is also open as needed.
We now show uniqueness, which we do by supposing that and are both topologies on which satisfy the properties.
Note that in the above if was continuous, then so are the compositions, so it's really if and only only if in the second bullet point.
To show it's a basis we will use the basis criterion. So let be an open set of , and let , since the product topology is generated by the basis , then we know that by the definition of a topology generated by a basis that there is an element such that .
Since we assumed that and were bases for and respectively then, we know that there is some element such that and there is some such that , thus we have found an element such that which proves that is a basis and that it generates the toplogy of
In order to prove that the two topologies are the same we will use this, so first we have to identify the basis for each topology, we recall the basis for . Then looking at we recall that, thus since we know that is a basis for and that is a basis for then a basis for their product is given by the set
Following the original corollary let and let be a basis element of the dictionary order topology containing , if then we must have and that in such a case the basis element is contained within and contains as needed. If it's the case that then it must be that with no restriction on as we are in the dictionary order, because for any we have that therefore we can consider the basis element , thus in either case we've found a basis element containing contained within the original basis element.
So now suppose that we had a basis element of the form containing , this implies that then note that which is already a basis element of the correct form, so we are done and the two topologies are equal.
We'll show that first, so let , but , so this set is simply
A symmetrical proof for can be obtained similarly.
Given this subbasis , and supposing that is the product topology on , our goal is to show that .
We'll first show that , an arbitrary element of is where , since is a finite intersection of elements of (which we know are open in ), then , showing that
For the other inclusion, let be a basis element for , but note that , thus by definition an element of , which shows that