We'll show that and are elements of , this can be seen as since , then and also since , then so
Now we want to prove that is closed under arbitrary unions, which we know because . Similarly we can see that it's closed under finite intersections as .
Therefore we know that is a topology.
- The inclusion from into is continuous
- Given a function , if is continuous, then is too
We show that the inclusion is continuous, so let be open in then consider which is open in the subspace topology so that is continuous
Now suppose that and that is continuous, let's verify that is continuous, so let be open in by the very definition this means that there is some such that therefore and therefore is open, as needed.
To see uniquness we suppose that and are both topologies satisfying the conditions, and we'll prove their equal by showing that the identity is a homomorphism. We start by considering the inclusions and , now suppose our identity is of the form then we know that , since is continuous, then by the second listed property we deduce that is continuous, so that , but then by doing the proof again with the roles of the topologies switched we obtain equality.
To prove this statement true, we'll use the handy basis criterion
First note that given any element , we know that it is open with respect to , because is open with respect to
Now let be an open set of which means that is open in . Let , since , is open in and is a basis for then we know there is some such that if that's the case then we know that , noting that , therefore we know that is a basis and it is for
We will show that the two topologies are equal by showing that the basis that generate them are equal.
Given the subspace of and of , then the product topology of has a basis of elements of the form where are open in respectively.
On the other hand ,an open set in is of the form where are open in respectively, thus a basis element for (as a subspace of )is a set of the form .
Now to connect the two recall thqt . So given a set, it is in the first basis if and only if it is in the second basis, meaning that the two bases are equal, and thus they generate the same topology.
- hits the left wall of , then the intersection is a half open interval
- does not hit the left wall of
- hits the top and right, or bottom and right wall, the intersection results in an open interval
Finally note that it's impossible for the line to hit a corner of the square as the open intervals stop that from occuring, therefore the above enumerates all possibilties for a non-vertical line. In other words the basis for this subspace are the open intervals and the half open intervals, since we already know that the standard topology is a subspace of the lower limit topology, this simply generates the lower limit topology, formally we could show that there is a homeomorphism between them by finding the intersection with the x axis, then doing a rotation, but since we are describing, we will not go so far.
When is vertical, so that it's not hard to see that the map and its inverse define a homeomorphism because open sets in are all just intervals, and pulls those back to the same interval in (the other direction is similar) and so the vertical line subspace is the standard topology.
Now if we consider , and look at the line again, if has positive slope then we get the lower limit topology as we get a basis as the half open intervals, if it is vertical or horizontal, then similarly to the above above, we get the factors, in this case the lower limit topology elsewise the slope is negative and it ends up being the discrete topology, that's because every single point set on is open, to see why, given a single point then it equals thus we have all singletons, so the discrete topology.